• NevOn
    NevOn is the archive weblog of Neville Hobson, a British business communicator based in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, a record of commentary and conversations from December 2002 until 22 February 2006. This site is no longer updated - please visit www.nevillehobson.com.
  • About Neville Hobson
  • Gmail email


  • For Immediate Release
    For Immediate Release: The Hobson & Holtz Report - A bi-weekly podcast for professional communicators from Neville Hobson, ABC, and Shel Holtz, ABC.

    Subscribe to podcast RSS feed

    Subscribe via iTunes

    Subscribe via Yahoo! Podcasts

    Enter your email address* and click "Vote" to cast your vote for FIR at Podcast Alley:

    *email used for vote verification.

2006 Public Speaking

  • Delivering The New PR – How Blogs, Podcasts and RSS Can Work For You - Manchester, UK, February 15, 2006

    New Communications Forum 2006 - Palo Alto, USA, March 1-3, 2006

    Blogging for Business - London, April 4, 2006

    Summit for the Future on Risk 2006 - Amsterdam, May 3-5, 2006

    IABC International Conference 2006 - Vancouver, Canada, June 4-7, 2006

2005 Public Speaking

  • Les Blogs 2.0 - Paris, December 5-6, 2005

    IABC EuroComm 2005 - Paris, Nov 30 - Dec 2, 2005

    Melcrum workshop on New Media - London, November 29, 2005

    Making the News: Blogging, Really Simple Syndication and The New PR - Sunderland, UK, November 18, 2005

    Emerce E-Day - Amsterdam, October 12, 2005

    Global PR Blog Week 2.0 - September 19-23, 2005

    PodcastCon UK - September 17, 2005

    The Communication Directors' Forum

    New Communications Forum 2005 - Napa, USA, January 26-27, 2005

Corporate Blogs

  • Comprehensive list of corporate blogs on The New PR Wiki. Also there: list of CEO blogs, product blogs, podcasts and more.



  • Listed on BlogShares
  • Blogarama - The Blog Directory
  • The British Bloggers Directory.
  • FeedDemon RSS & Atom Reader
  • Kinja, the weblog guide
  • Get Firefox!
  • Powered by TypePad
  • We're Not Afraid
  • Download iPodder, the cross-platform podcast receiver

« UK newspaper wants to host blogs | Main | Blogs as 'editorial innovation' for mainstream media »

09 April 2005


Allan Jenkins

I'd hate to be "royal" in the 21st century. No upside:

* The money is good, of course, but you can't deploy it in a thoroughly fun, vulgar way (i.e. lubricants, sunny climes and tacky yachts).

* You're locked in the job from birth (so you can just go ahead and purge yourself of dreams).

* The world hangs on your every word, because they hope you will say something remarkably stupid.

And, to top it off, you can't actually "do" anything without checking with the Government.

I wonder how any of them stand it.

Perhaps the 20/30 somethings of Europe's royal families will find themselves together at some happening and decide, collectively, to say "enough: declare republican governments, or we're going to be truly obnoxious!"

Neville Hobson

Good one, Allan!

Re the Prince shaking hands with Mugabe gaffe, I was reading further news reporting about this. My commentary could be interprested as that Prince Charles shook hands with Mugabe in a normal way, ie, he went up to him and greeted him.

Not like that at all, it seems. Looks like Mugabe came up to him which took him by surprise and he reached out his hand to shake before he twigged who the other person was. By that time, too late to change body tactics.

The thought that then sprang to my mind was whoever organized the seating, etc, at the event should have ensured that the Prince was nowhere near someone like Mugabe (which, according to news reports, was precisely what happened for Tony Blair). However, I can imagine the logistics nightmare of such event planning.

Allan Jenkins

I believe protocol leaves little room for not shaking hands with Mugabe if you are seated beside him. Charles Windsor may think Robert Mugabe as much of a toad as the rest of us do, but the man is the head of state of a country Britain has diplomatic relations with. Britain is, "officially", polite to Zimbabwe, so the British rep on the spot must also be.

But, there you have it again: being "royal" means being put into all sorts of situations you a) would rather not be in and b) would deal with a different way if you weren't "on the job".

You mention the seating planning. From all accounts, the Vatican is masterful at protocol. I struggle to believe that the seating was entirely coincidental. But to what purpose?

Neville Hobson

From all the news reports I've read, it just looks like a very unfortunate circumstance. It seems that Mugabe made a bee-line for the Prince, so it looks like there was no escape!

Marc Cornelius

I also think we're missing a big point here about a major improvement in Charles' communications. Sure, he's had a few awful blunders in the run-up to the wedding - I bet he couldn't believe it as each gaffe unfolded before him.

BUT, the coverage with Paddy Harverson is a lot more significant for the future. In the UK we don't give much prominence to official spokesmen: Alistair Campbell never had his own TV slot like Ari Fleisher, and I bet few people could name Campbell's replacement. That has traditionally been all the more true for the Royal Family, who have communicated through statements but seldom through spokespeople.

However, over the weekend, what we did we have but Paddy H appearing on radio and TV explaining the Prince's position. He is an inspired choice - he is tremendously proficient, but also totally down to earth. He is the kind of man anyone in the pub could relate to. Suddenly, Charles has found a way of creating a connection with the general public that gets around his rather stiff and formal manner. I think the US model of official spokesperson (carefully selected) could be the answer the Royals have been looking for to head off all the criticism of them being out of touch.

Neville Hobson

Good points, Marc. I would agree with you that Paddy Harverson makes a smooth spokesman, judging from his brief TV interview I saw on Saturday. From his bio on the Prince's website, he looks like he has all the credentials to handle such a role.

I'm not sure, though, that contrasting him and his role with that of Ari Fleishman at the White House is a valid comparison. Unless you're thinking that Harverson would conduct regular and frequent press briefings. To what end, though? I'd say Harverson would have an unenviable job in that he has a 'product' that isn't really ready for that type of PR, and probably never will be.

Your mentioning Prince Charles having someone to really connect with the general public is the key point, I think. Part of the problem, too, as the royal family in general are simply too remote and detached from the general public. That's a pretty simple view, I know, but I contrast that with the Dutch royal family. Now there's down to earth and with universal respect. I don't see that in the British royal family.

Which raises a good question - why would we expect the royal family to be anything other than aloof and detached? That's history and they don't look as though they really want to change that. I was reading a rather good column yesterday by Brian Walden on the subject of why Prince Charles gets a slamming all the time, on the BBC website (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4425821.stm). A good assessment of what's happening today.

The comments to this entry are closed.

New Blog

  • Go to www.nevillehobson.com

Google Search Nevon

Corante Network

Content Syndication


  • Verified Member of the AttentionTrust



Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 07/2004