About


  • NevOn
    NevOn is the archive weblog of Neville Hobson, a British business communicator based in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, a record of commentary and conversations from December 2002 until 22 February 2006. This site is no longer updated - please visit www.nevillehobson.com.
  • About Neville Hobson
  • Gmail email

Podcast

  • For Immediate Release
    For Immediate Release: The Hobson & Holtz Report - A bi-weekly podcast for professional communicators from Neville Hobson, ABC, and Shel Holtz, ABC.


    Subscribe to podcast RSS feed


    Subscribe via iTunes


    Subscribe via Yahoo! Podcasts


    Enter your email address* and click "Vote" to cast your vote for FIR at Podcast Alley:

    *email used for vote verification.

2006 Public Speaking

  • Delivering The New PR – How Blogs, Podcasts and RSS Can Work For You - Manchester, UK, February 15, 2006

    New Communications Forum 2006 - Palo Alto, USA, March 1-3, 2006

    Blogging for Business - London, April 4, 2006

    Summit for the Future on Risk 2006 - Amsterdam, May 3-5, 2006

    IABC International Conference 2006 - Vancouver, Canada, June 4-7, 2006

2005 Public Speaking

  • Les Blogs 2.0 - Paris, December 5-6, 2005

    IABC EuroComm 2005 - Paris, Nov 30 - Dec 2, 2005

    Melcrum workshop on New Media - London, November 29, 2005

    Making the News: Blogging, Really Simple Syndication and The New PR - Sunderland, UK, November 18, 2005

    Emerce E-Day - Amsterdam, October 12, 2005

    Global PR Blog Week 2.0 - September 19-23, 2005

    PodcastCon UK - September 17, 2005

    The Communication Directors' Forum

    New Communications Forum 2005 - Napa, USA, January 26-27, 2005

Corporate Blogs


  • Comprehensive list of corporate blogs on The New PR Wiki. Also there: list of CEO blogs, product blogs, podcasts and more.

Blogroll


Connections

  • Listed on BlogShares
  • Blogarama - The Blog Directory
  • The British Bloggers Directory.
  • FeedDemon RSS & Atom Reader
  • Kinja, the weblog guide
  • Get Firefox!
  • Powered by TypePad
  • We're Not Afraid
  • Download iPodder, the cross-platform podcast receiver



« It's all happening in France | Main | Hardly a gap between Windows and Linux »

06 April 2005

Comments

Jonathan Marks

I think they have got their definitions wrong. If I download the Today programme on BBC Radio 4, I have downloaded a broadcast. If I subscribe to any piece of audio designed to be played on a desktop or portable player, you can argue I am picking up a podcast. Sounds like the same sort of confusion as when people were asked if they listened to "cable radio". 80% in Holland said yes. Turned out they had a radio - and it had a cable on it - the power cable. It wasn't connected to the cable at all.

But are there real stats coming out about Podcasting? Yes. NASA has published figures. IT Conversations is going open source.

Many podcasters are vague when it comes to mentioning audience figures, or downloads-per-show. I think it is in the region of 30,000 downloads per show for the popular ones, down to just a few dozen for most of them. Some people seem to forget that you are only as good as your last show...if it bites....so will the figures. So how is NASA doing? Between its December launch and the end of February 2005, listeners accessed the Science@NASA podcast more than 360,000 times. That compares well to subscriptions to science magazines in the store (between 15,000 and 60,000 readers depending on the country).

I disagree with the remark on FIR that audio quality and presentation don't really matter, so long as the content is good. Whilst I think that authentic voices clearly have an edge on the over-polished radio presenters, I do appreciate someone who has taken the time to craft their podcast...too much of the "slice of my life, uncut and unedited" is as exciting as watching paint dry.

Will Pate

Podcasts are just mp3 files enclosed in RSS feeds. I can subscribe to an RSS feed and have a program download any mp3 linked to in the post. Maybe I want to just subscribe to RSS feeds of mp3 blogs and download the mp3s at my own choosing. RSS feeds are just a kind of XML and XHTML is a reformulation of HTML as XML. I can have a program check an XHTML page and download all linked mp3s. Hey, I could even be enclosing ogg vorbis or *shudder* realmedia files in my RSS feed.

Clearly, defining podcasting so narrowly doesn't prove to be all that useful. Fussing over what's a podcast, what's a weblog post with an MP3 linked only inside it, or even attached to a node as Drupal does, is splitting hairs. The Pew study speaks to the popularity of time-shifted, citizen created radio - whatever you want to call it.

Neville Hobson

Jonathan, I agree with you on the definitions point. There is quite a bit of mis-communication, let's say, surrounding podcasts and what they are. As Will says, they're MP3 (typically) files enclosed in RSS feeds. So the name 'podcast' is to do with the distribution, not the medium itself.

However, this is one of those things where it looks like a losing battle to apply a purist approach to closely defining what this is. People will talk about podcasts when they mean going to a site and downloading a file, as in "you can download my podcast from...". But so what?

I think your point on audience figures is more interesting, and is one that will be increasingly important for some podcasters who will need to show evidence of the reach and influence their shows have, especially if things move along into the commercial area where sponsors get interested. As with any communication medium, this enters the traditional area of measurement and analysis. In the case of the show Shel and I do, we're becoming very conscious of this need. Measuring only by bandwidth consumption just isn't good enough, so we're looking at some methodologies that will give us more credible analysis. All we can do right now is work out averages. So, for example, we know from bandwidth stats that our show currently attracts anywhere between 500 and 1,000 downloads (meaning both manual downloading from the podcast site as well as retrieval via the RSS feed) per show. To put that in context, the average for the first month we started (January) was about 30 to 50.

What I'd really like to know, though, is what percentage of those numbers translate into actual listeners. We don't know that yet.

The numbers you mention (30,000) apply to those shows that have wide general appeal. Adam Curry, for instance. Or Dawn & Drew. The great thing about this medium - it's nanopublishing, to grab that vogue word - is that the production costs are relatively minute which gives literally anyone an opportunity to start a show where if only a couple of hundred people like it, that's still good enough to justify doing it.

And on audio quality and presentation, well, I'd have to agree with you there - they do matter. Yet it's a subjective point, isn't it? What may be as exciting as watching paint dry to you, could be the most stimulating thing to someone else.

That's another great thing about this niche medium - there's something for everyone's tastes!

Shel posted a detailed commentary on his blog on Monday about podcasting and Darren's post. Worth a read, especially the comments -

http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/is_podcasting_for_real/

The comments to this entry are closed.

New Blog

  • Go to www.nevillehobson.com

Google Search Nevon


Corante Network

Content Syndication

Affiliation

  • Verified Member of the AttentionTrust

Advertising

Flickr


Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 07/2004